THIS SITE IS NOW CLOSED
August 14, 2006
WordPress Wins
I have decided upon WordPress rather than Blogger. It is impossible in
Blogger to have a truly unique look. My site would always appear like
one million others. With WordPress, having a personal look to my blog is
a snap. There are literally hundreds of templates. The one you see at my
soon to be only blog site
is only the latest look and feel I have been experimenting with.
Whatever the difficulties were with WordPress---photo insertion, for
example---its myriad programmers (it is open code) have been working on
them.
WordPress is more difficult to use then Blogger but time spent now will
pay off in the end. I like the idea of using a true blog program rather
than creating my own (crude) web pages. My site looks tighter and more
professional. All I have to do now is improve my writing, alas.
I will be working all day to add links and things to the basic design.
By tomorrow I will write no more here and will arrange with my DNS host
to automatically direct all visitors here to my new site.
All archives from almost 4 years of writing will be available at
WordPress but they will stay in the old format. Eventually all my
backpacking files will be in WordPress as well. My Professional Teaching
site will also have a link.
In the meantime, pray for Israel, hope for the destruction of Hezbollah,
and go have a beer---but not necessarily in that order.
top

August 11, 2006
Geeky Stuff
I have just finished a book about blogging called
Blogging For Dummies. (Stop laughing.) The author writes of all
the blogging possibilities mentioned below. It looks as if WordPress and
Blogger are the best choices. Here is my blog in one of the
Blogger templates,
and here is one in
WordPress. These are only temporary and likely will end up being
radically different. This week I will choose one or the other and begin
to write only on that platform.
Each has things I like and things I do not like.
WordPress in hosted for free at Yahoo. Since I have my domain at Yahoo
it is a snap to use. All files are automatically loaded on my host at
Yahoo. To write I do not need special software but only need to log on
to Yahoo. But: loading photos in WordPress is a slow and cumbersome
business---and I upload these all the time. Apparently the font size for
posting cannot be changed. Templates are few though WordPress has a site
where there are literally hundreds more. Still, these are a bit clumsy
to download and install. Many of these look great though.
Blogger seems to have about half the business in the
blogging world. It is free and offers unlimited space for your blog. And
it is simple. Photos are placed in your blog in a few seconds. Posting
is easy, and I can host all my files on my ftp server at Yahoo. There
are not many templates, however, so any Blogger site is instantly
recognizable.
My main concern is this: though many bloggers begin
there, the more popular a blog gets the more likely the owner switches
to another platform, like WordPress, TypePad or Moveable Type. I would
not enjoy changing my mind after a year or two and having to change
sites. But it must be said that many of the most prominent bloggers---The
Belmont Club, for example---use Blogger.
Alas, TypePad
is another possibility, but I would have to pay around $100 per year. I
could host my files at Yahoo though, and photos and editing are snaps.
What to do?
top

Playing Us For Saps
I have written several posts about how the mainstream media---what Rush
calls the 'drive by media'---purposefully lies and distorts. They have
no intention on providing news, only propaganda. They are in the
business of shaping reality to their ideology. Media 'truth' is a
relative thing, always able to be modified as circumstances change.
The war in Lebanon is only the most recent---and the clearest---example
of how the media falsifies their 'reporting.' The media despise Israel.
Period. (They also despise conservatives and Christianity, but more on
these some other time.)
Here is a
clarifying example of how they do it---and how they have done it. They
really think us stupid.
As I have said for years, if you read them or listen to them or watch
them---and believe them---you are a fool.
(Hat tip:
Gateway Pundit)
top

August 9, 2006
Taking the Plunge
I began reading blogs around 2000. Thus inspired, I acquired my own
domain---mikeaustin.org---and started my own
web page two years
later. At first It was for professional reasons. I kept all of my
teaching stuff over there---resume, biography, certifications and so on.
I still do.
Beginning in 2003 I began to write blog-type commentary almost daily. It
was at the outset of the Iraq War and I had much material to work with.
I used Microsoft FrontPage as my HTML editor and still use it today. It
was convenient, as I was about to embark on a year-long solo backpacking
trip around Central and South America. I wanted a way to write a sort of
on-line diary on all that I was doing in Peru, Chile, Honduras and parts
yonder. Since every internet cafe throughout Latin America used
Microsoft Office and usually had FrontPage as well, I could access my
web page wherever I was. The plan worked marvelously and the results are
here.
I continued writing after returning to the US, though
deciding in January 2005 that I wanted to have two web pages, one for
professional things and the other devoted just to writing. Thus was born
my blog the return of scipio. You are reading it now.
Gradually I saw the limitations of my method, that of
setting up my own blog using FrontPage. Bloggy things like trackbacks,
comments, RSS feeds, permalinks were at the very
least difficult to manage. Every blogger I read used one of several
methods each offering software written for bloggers---Blogger,
WordPress,
Moveable Type,
TypePad.
Now I will too. Today and tomorrow I will choose the
software most suitable for me and for my blogging style. It will remain
on my domain and retain my blog name the return of scipio. So
expect a radically different site soon.
I am not sure how I will access my archives with the new
software. More than likely they will not be able to be ported, and so
will remain in the current web page format.
I am also working on a site devoted just to solo
backpacking in Latin America. Surprisingly, it will be called Solo
Backpacking in Latin America.
So I will be furiously busy getting all of these things
done in the next few days before a new horde of 8th graders arrive.
Stay tuned.
top

August 8, 2006
Cuba in Fact not Fantasy
As usual,
Babalu Blog has the goods on events of that dismal isle.
I
see where 400 'intellectuals' have warned the US to keep her
hands of that workers paradise. The list is an excellent resource to
find an idiot. Every signatory is a moral imbecile.
And if the US intervenes there, what will those 'intellectuals' do?
As for the future of Cuba...stay tuned.
top

August 7, 2006
Goebbels Comes
Alive!
Old
Joe Goebbels had it
right: If you lie make it a whopper and repeat it constantly. Do these
and soon the lie will become such a part of conventional wisdom that
everybody believes it without thinking.
Our own
media have used this technique since before I was a babe---long before.
Jefferson had their number back the youthful days of our Great Republic.
He had a low view of the
media
of his day.
Nothing in this paper is
true, with the possible exception of the advertising, and I question
that.
And
- I do
not take a single newspaper, nor read one a month, and I feel
myself infinitely the happier for it.
And
The
man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who
reads nothing but newspapers.
Amen brother! It appears
that the inky wretches in days of yore were as truth challenged then as
they are now. Plus ça change, plus c'est le
meme chose.
And take even a cursory
glance at the media during our Civil War. All was hatred of Honest Abe,
who was described in terms that George Bush could understand. "Traitor!"
"Liar!" "Murderer!" "War monger!"
Harpers went further into its Thesaurus to describe Lincoln as "a
despot, liar, thief, braggart, buffoon, usurper, monster, ignoramus." It
sounds like Cindy Sheehan spewing forth about Bush, but these words came
from the media elite of the day.
Here is one of their
charming cartoons showing what they thought of Lincoln, one of the
greatest men of any age and time:

Once our
lovely media get an idea in their head, it stays there:

Our media
have even started a war---the
Spanish-American War.
Joseph Pulitzer was also a key in
publicizing the war in New York City. His
newspapers, along with Hearst's, exaggerated news of
the atrocities in Cuba in an attempt to sway popular
opinion in New York City in favor of intervention.
Hearst was famously (though probably
erroneously) quoted, in a response to a request by
his illustrator Frederic Remington to return home
from an uneventful and docile stay in Havana, as
writing: "Please remain. You furnish the pictures
and I'll furnish the war."
We need not
repeat here the media lies of Walter Duranty about the
USSR, of Wally Cronkite during Vietnam, of Dan Rather
about 'fake but accurate' reporting and of media
darlings Eason Jordan, Howell Raines and Jason Blair.
You really should be conversant with these folks and
their shameless mendacities. If you are not, do your
homework. Ignorance is not bliss, it is---ignorance.
And now our
media are trying to end the war in Iraq---ignominiously,
as is their wont---and assist the practiced killers of
Hezbollah to defeat Israel. If you have not heard of
Reuters latest attempt to falsify the news using
photo-shopped pictures, just go
here.

Reversing
Hearst, our media exclaim, "You furnish the pictures and
I'll end the war."
The media
have been busy endlessly peddling Big Lies about Iraq. Here is a
sample that would make Goebbels proud.
1.
Bush lied about the reasons for the Iraq war.
2.
Saddam had nothing to do with al-Qaeda.
3.
No WMDs have been found in Iraq.
4.
Bush knew beforehand about 9/11.
If you
believe any of these to be true, you are irrational. No logic or reason
could possibly change your mind, alas. You belong to the media and are
their servant. And no, I do not wish to debate you. I would be wasting
your time, and you, mine. And there is this:
But avoid foolish disputes,
genealogies, contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are
unprofitable and useless. Reject a divisive man after the first and
second admonition, knowing that such a person is warped and sinning,
being self-condemned.---Titus 3:9-11
There are
more examples of Big Lies---there are always more---but it tires to write about them.
One of
their constantly repeated refrains is that 'they speak truth to power.'
As usual, the opposite is the case. Our media cringe when faced with
real power, the type of power that can send you to a Gulag. Read any of
their craven reports from Lebanon and Iraq. Watch CNN as it gets on its
knees to the god Castro.
The media
consider themselves bold and courageous because they 'stand up to Bush'
while hiding behind the First Amendment. They betray secrets in wartime
knowing that nothing whatsoever will happen to them. They willingly
serve the role as 'useful idiots' to our enemies.
If you
want to know how a real journalist speaks truth to power, look at the
career of Oriana
Fallaci.

The
American media have nothing remotely like her. Instead, we have this
worthless fellow, Pinch Sulzberger of the New York Times.

All major
media---The New York Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times, the
Boston Globe, the BBC, NPR, CBS, ABC, NBC, Reuters, the Associated
Press, CNN---agree on the major issues of the day. They march in
lock-step, feeding us without end their view of the world. Few media
creatures attend church, fewer vote Republican and almost none have
served in the military. So what sort of 'fair and balanced' view do you
expect from them? One expects what one gets: the views of a liberal,
condescending, arrogant, craven and pagan elite.
If your views on 'Life,
the Universe and Everything' come from these guys, you are a dupe. But
you certainly do not have to remain one.
For years
these media had an absolute monopoly on what Americans read and heard.
Now they are faced with competition all around, from Rush to Fox News to
bloggers. Just like all liars caught in a web of mendacity, the media
howl and yelp when their bigoted and narrow opinions are challenged.
So many media lies, so
little time! Which leads one to wonder: We can catch the media today in
their falsifications and distortions. But what of the past? How many
lies have they spread about Vietnam? About Goldwater? About Nixon? How
many of us believed them? How much of recent American history is
composed of nothing but lies conjured up in press rooms? Must we go back
and review every article and editorial and photo and headline?
Truly Goebbels lives, a
media icon for our time.

top

August 6, 2006
Oh Brother, Where Art Thou?
Still no Raúl! It has been almost two weeks and the hard
drinking brother of Fidel is yet unaccounted for. Considering his
extra-curricular activities he just might be curled up somewhere with
his buddy Crown Royal.
The Cuban 'government'---hardly a real government, really
just a family gang enterprise of the Castro brothers their
sycophants---has issued several cryptic statements, some of which
contradict others.
This little gem appeared in the Brazilian newspaper,
Folha de Sao Paulo.
Cuban authorities told the president and the Workers
Party (PT) that the dictator has cancer and that even if he recovers
he might not return to power.
Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da
Silva ('Lula') went all girly-girl about the problems of the Cuban tyrant. In
the same words my mother said to me when my first puppy became sick,
Lula wept:
It looks like we are going to lose our friend.
So cry me a river, Lula! But anyway, one
can hope that the people of Cuba are about to lose their little friend. But then one hopes the
Cuban killer is already smoking cigars with Arafat---or simply just
smoking. But then comes
this
from the Cuban regime:
Vice President Carlos Lage denied a newspaper report
that the 79-year-old former guerrilla fighter who had surgery for
internal bleeding and temporarily turned over power to brother Raul
on Monday, is suffering from stomach cancer and has an unfavorable
prognosis.
Now we hear
that little Danny Ortega (yep, the unemployed
Sandinista of yore) has
arrived in Havana to give aid and comfort to his long-time pal. Or
perhaps, the Nicaraguan punk is there to help plan for a state funeral
and line up favors for himself with the new Cuban regime when he returns
to power in Managua.
While all of
this has been going on, the Cuban military has
mobilized and is taking positions across Cuba to prevent a US
invasion. (No, really!)
So what is
really going on down Cuba way?
I stick to my
guns Piña Colada and state:
1.
Castro is dead.
2.
Raúl is dead or soon will be.
3.
The regime is not sure what to do, thus the contradictory statements and
moving the army thither and yon.
4.
There is blood flowing behind the scenes as the acolytes of the dead
Fidel jockey for power.
5.
A new ruling junta will be soon be announced.
6.
In due course a new boss, same as the old boss, will rise to the top.
7.
But he will not stay for long, and Cuba will enter period of violence
against the regime funded by the US and by anti-Castro groups in Miami.
Or something
like that. Remember, we have been here before when all those Soviet
dictators died: the secrecy, the contradictions, the political
maneuvering, the elimination of rivals, and so on.
All of which
makes for great political theater.
Stay tuned.
(Hat tip:
Babalu Blog)
top

August 5, 2006
Random
Thoughts
Joe
Lieberman is in trouble. No doubt he will lose the Democrat primary to
the dissembling Ned Lamont. The reason why the Democrat Party has tossed
old Joe over the side is because of Iraq. The party is controlled by its
more kook elements---the Daily Kos, MoveOn.org and such flotsam---and
like the ChiComs during the 'Great Cultural Revolution' these types
brook no variation of the party line. So Joe must go.
And now a
bunch of conservatives have lined up behind Lieberman, people such as
the yappy Sean Hannity. But why? Lieberman is your run-of-the-mill
eastern seaboard liberal. He supports abortion, special rights for
sodomites and the rest of the liberal socialist smorgasbord. He enjoys
being thought of as a practicing Jew---yarmulke worn in public and all
that---but tossed much of his Jewish belief out the window when he
agreed to be put on the ticket with weird Al Gore in 2000. He claimed to
be anti-abortion before---the Jewish thing again---but became
pro-abortion while running for vice-president.
What do you call a man
who supports the killing of children so that he can gain power?
Lieberman
is for sale. He has very little honor. And so those with even less
honor---those who run the Democrat Party---have moved in for the kill.
So tell me
why I should feel sorry for Joe? Run with pigs and you get covered in
slop.
So here is
a suggestion for Joe: Run as a Republican in the general election. After
all, he would not be out of place with the smarmy likes of Specter and
Hagel.
__________
Mel Gibson
is a drunk, not an anti-Semite. Demon Rum has him in its throes.
Addictions---drugs, booze, gambling, pornography---are not things one
can simply decide not to surrender to. The struggle with addiction is
life-long. There are victories. There are defeats. No one---no one---can
overcome addiction without God.
Addiction
is in fact a being, a creature, though not a very nice one. Ask any
cocaine addict. He talks of his addiction as if it were a person. Heroin
addicts speak of 'the monkey on their back.' Porn addicts curse their
addiction as if they are being pursued by a demon from Hell---which is
exactly the case.
Were I
Satan---and I am not, no matter what my students think---I would be
heartily p***ed at Gibson for his Passion of the Christ. In the
words of Pope John Paul II when asked what he thought of the film: "It
is as it was." Furious at such negative publicity, Old Scratch then
ginned up his pals in Hollywood---about everyone there---to condemn and
attack Gibson. They failed, and Passion went on the earn upwards
of 1 billion dollars. Think of all that cool publicity for God lovers!
But the
Devil is a patient fellow. He caught Mel in a weak moment and went for
the kill---and scored. And it was a 'two-fer'---bringing to ugly light
Gibson's struggle with alcohol and putting Jew-hatred in his mouth. The
Devil hates Jews, of course. Jesus, Mary, Joseph, Paul, Peter, the whole
original crowd---all Jews.
And so the friends and
servants of Beelzebub line up to take a shot at Gibson.
But this
will pass. You see, Gibson is a God lover. (I recognize the type. I also
understand addiction well. Quite well.) He will pray for help and he
will get it. But the removal of this thorn in Gibson's side will not
happen in this life. Paul knew this too.
Therefore, to keep me from
being too elated, a thorn was given me in the flesh, a messenger of
Satan to torment me, to keep me from being too elated.
Three times I
appealed to the Lord about this, that it would leave me,
but he said
to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for power is made perfect in
weakness."---2 Corinthians 12:
7-10
And Mel is
learning who in Hollywood is really a friend and who is not---a
refreshing moment of clarity.
Here is what Gibson's friends are up to---Jody Foster among them.
And more
here.
__________
It is
about impossible to speak of Ronald Reagan in something other than
reverential tones. 'The Great Ronald,' as Rush says.
Ok, I love
Reagan too. But his policies in the Middle East were disasters. For
Reagan the Middle East was a sideshow, and his lack of interest in it
showed. After the 1983 bombing of the Marine barracks---financed by
Iran, assisted by Syria, carried out by (guess who?) Hezbollah---Reagan
did absolutely nothing. The American people would have completely
supported a massive strike against Syria, Iran and southern Lebanon, but
Reagan dithered. Our enemies took note that the killing of hundreds of
Americans will get no response from the US government.
Kill one
hoot owl in Oregon and you went to prison. Kill Americans by the bucket
load and nothing whatsoever happened. Thanks Ron!
What we
see today are the fruits of such policies.
The Middle
East policies of Carter and Clinton were far worse, of course, if that
makes you feel better.
__________
This just in:
The sky is blue! The wind
blows! Grass is green! Hell is hot! Eggs have cholesterol! Water flows
downhill!
And:
Iran admits to re-supplying Hezbollah!
Damn! I didn't know half
this stuff!
top

August 3, 2006
Where
in the World is Raúl?
With
brother Fidel dead, dying or otherwise out of the picture, Raúl is
thought to be the next president-for-life. It is believed that Fidel
turned over power to his brother before he went under the surgeon's
knife. So where is the old boy?
Not only
is Raúl silent, but the Cuban bureaucracy is
more than a little
closed-mouth.
Cuba's Communist Party tried to quell fears of chaos
on Thursday following the temporary surrender of power by the ailing
Fidel Castro but failed to clear up doubts over who is in charge of
the island. In a typically cryptic message, the main
Communist Party newspaper Granma printed an old speech by Raul
Castro, who took over island leadership on Monday, saying that his
brother's only heir was the Communist Party itself.
It is
known that Raúl has a special relationship with both Johnny Walker and
Jack Daniels. It is also known that he personally murdered hundreds of
his enemies. He is a true believer in communism. After all, it has
served him and brother Fidel quite well. But he is no spring chicken.
That he wears dentures is obvious. What are those medals for?

See
here for an assessment of Cuba under Raúl and after Raúl follows his
brother into the abyss.
The US is
preparing for the death of the longest-ruling tyrant on earth. To bring
Cuba back into the family of free nations has been US policy since JFK,
though it was that president's agreement with the USSR not to invade
Cuba that allowed Castro to place a vice-grip on the island nation.
The
political spin and behind-the-scenes maneuvering in Cuba resembles
nothing so much as that which always occurred when a Soviet dictator
died. Some
even believe a military coup is in play. Recall the death of Stalin in
1953. Beria seized power, but then was killed by his fellow communists.
Like Raúl Beria had a lot of baggage.
My guess?
Fidel is dead. Other regime communists could not see Raúl as anything
but a problematic alcoholic, with many scores to settle after a lifetime
of scheming, in-fighting and murder. Raúl is probably dead as well. Most certainly there is
blood-play happening behind closed doors in Havana.
This is
always how communism dies, in blood and conspiracy.
And
perhaps Fidel's death was 'not so much timely as well-timed.' We will
know soon. There are fun days ahead.
Stay
tuned. And have a Cuba
Libre.
(Update: Babalu
Blog)
George
Bush is on the case.
Here is what he said moments ago. It seems the White House knows
something the public does not---a good thing, I am sure.
The United States is
absolutely committed to supporting the Cuban people's aspirations
for democracy and freedom. We have repeatedly said that the Cuban
people deserve to live in freedom...We will support you in your
effort to build a transitional government in Cuba committed to
democracy, and we will take note of those, in the current Cuban
regime, who obstruct your desire for a free Cuba.
[emphasis added]
Sounds like old George believes FIdel to
be somewhere with Arafat. And George has Raúl's number as
well. I hope los hermanos putos y Cubanos save a place for
Chavez.
top

22August 2, 2006
Hezbollah's Worst Nightmares
The
Jew-hating and viciously misogynistic child killers of Hezbollah are
being defeated by Jewish girls like the ones
below.
(Click.)




No wonder the Hezbos are
getting their butts kicked.
Of course,
the guys are helping out too. Here they are with some---llamas! I have
no idea what the IDF is planning with those llamas while crossing the
Israeli-Lebanese border. It seems even animals want a piece of
Hezbollah.


Oh dear,
what will the Arab street do?
(Hat
tip:
Gateway Pundit)
top

Army of Idiots
Our own media have always been in love with
political killers. They romanticize them, whether they be a Lenin or a Mao or an
'Uncle Ho' or Sandinistas or
Palestinians or a Ché or a Fidel. The only requirement is that the
killers hate America and her allies. Nothing else matters.
Hezbollah is the latest band of murderers to get
this treatment. According to the standard media refrain, Hezbollah is:
1. A resistance movement. This conjures up
images of heroic French Resistance fighters in WW II (all two of them) waging a
courageous shadow war against the Nazis.
2. A political party. Here we are to believe
that Hezbollah is rather like our own Democrats and Republicans, but with funny
hats.
3. Anti-colonialists. Here Israel is seen as
an outpost of Western Civilization, and thus nothing more than a group of
invaders who should be forced to go home, wherever that might be.
4. The finest fighters in the Islamic world.
Perhaps they are. Of course, such an appellation would not require much fighting
ability at all. The competition for this title is rather less than fierce.
5. Beloved by the Lebanese. We shall see.
6. An 'army of God'. Of Allah, certainly. But
of the Hebrew and Christian God? I think not.
You get the picture. It boils down to 'Israel bad.
Hezbollah good.' These Islamic killers get the same treatment from the media
that the PLO got. Thus, there are plenty of manufactured PR opportunities for
the 'Hezbos.' Slain children are only the latest fad. All this takes is for some
Hezbollah-type to inform the media that the Israelis murder Arab children. The
media show up, take the required photos as the dead children are waved around,
and---voila!---a photo op.
The world then purrs in Gadarene unison: 'Israel
bad! Hezbollah good!'
Well. Just who are these Hezbos anyway?
They are indeed a political party of sorts, in the
same way that the Capone mob was a political party of sorts. Old Scarface ran
candidates, bribed judges and murdered his opponents. The Hezbos do the same
thing in Lebanon. And like Capone they try to win the hearts and minds of the
common folk, supporting schools and hospitals and such. When the Hezbos are
rendered impotent by the Israeli army, we will see how popular they are in
Lebanon.
As to their
strategic and tactical abilities on the field of battle, they are woefully ignorant and demonstrably incompetent. The
military leaders of Hezbollah are stuffed with arcane bits of Koranic theology,
but of Sun Tzu, Clausewitz and Machiavelli, forget it. Here is one of their
leaders, one
Sayed Ali. He spent the last five years in Tehran studying Islamic theology.
He learned nothing of any practical use in combat.
Patience
is our main virtue, we can wait for days, weeks, months before we attack.
The Israelis are always impatient in battle and in strategy...I know them
very well.
Not well enough, you moron. Of all the Arab-Israeli
wars, Israel has won them all hands down. And this, even though the Arabs number
350,000,000 and the Israelis 7,000,000. And even as this military imbecile was
speaking Israeli commandos
strolled behind
enemy lines right into the Hezbollah stronghold of Baalbek, killed a number of
them and made off with some Hezbo commanders. The Israelis suffered zero
casualties.
Our silly media was all amazed at how ingenious Hezbollah
was because it built a whole series of underground forts and tunnels in southern
Lebanon. Come again? What did Napoleon and Caesar and the Spartans and the
Conquistadors think of forts other than places to be either ignored or
destroyed. Sherman and Patton never built a one. The Marines in the Pacific
theater in WW II bypassed most of the Japanese island forts and blasted the rest
to pieces. For every Marine killed the Japanese suffered 22 killed.
Forts are monuments to stupidity. Ask the French
about the Maginot Line and Dien Bien Phu. Forts provide an address for the
enemy to either destroy or ignore at his whim, thereby leaving those inside them
isolated and impotent---or dead. Hezbollah built forts which the Israeli Air
Force is demolishing tunnel by tunnel.
If Hezbollah is 'the army
of God,' then the Islamic god is a very poor general. Like all Islamic
warriors from Mohammed to Baghdad Bob it are prone to bombast and a
bizarre braggadocio that claims every defeat a victory and every
humiliation a success. The Hezbos are competent at slitting the
throats of bound women and murdering children, nothing more.
Hezbollah is an arm of Iran, a mercenary corps of
fighters who do the mullahs' bidding. These mercenaries are re-supplied through
Syria, an Iranian puppet state. Israel has for all intents and purposes cut this
Islamic Ho Chi Minh Trail, leaving the Hezbos isolated and with a steadily
decreasing supply of rockets and launchers. Hezbollah is being broken apart and annihilated.
Nothing else will do. No cease-fire will do. No peace keeping force will do.
Only victory will do. And every Israeli understands this.
And there
is nothing that any Muslim can do about it. The media, true to form,
howls about the 'Arab
street,' about how Israel is only inflaming it. Who cares about what
this ephemeral 'Arab street' thinks about anything? Who cares if it is
'inflamed' about Hezbollah or not? The ignorant and unwashed of the
Islamic world are always aflame about this or about that. It takes
nothing to set off the Moslems who live on the Arab street. Even
cartoons suffice.
The coming
destruction of Hezbollah will be one happy event. Iran will be seen to
be impotent to aid her own fighters. Syria will be seen to be impotent
to re-supply the terror group on Syria's own borders. Lebanon will at
last have a chance to determine her own destiny. Israel will be free
from missile attack.
The media
will lament the death of these brave freedom fighters, of course. But
these pompous sycophants will just have to find others. Already waiting
in the wings: Hugo Chavez and Ahmadinejad.

Let the
love fest begin!
top

August 1, 2006
Go to
Hell

And so the
rumors fly: Is the 'Bearded One' dead? All who really know have not
said. We have been this way before. Can it be true this time?
Please
God. If not now, when?
The Cuban
people imprisoned on their lovely isle
wait.

The Cuban
people living in Miami
sing and dance.

Fidel
himself either lies in a hospital bleeding internally or has already
gone to his reward.
The death watch for this
hijo de la chingada continues.
top

July 31, 2006
Surrender or
Fight
If we had
fought World War II the way we are fighting the war against Islamic
fascism we would have lost in 1942. The world as we know it would have
never come to be. All today would be a dark night of totalitarianism.
Western Civilization would exist only in history books---or perhaps it
would have simply been sent down the memory hole. The survivors would
exist as slaves to Hitler's descendants. Those who survived the Greater
East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere would be slaves to the new samurai.
Had we
lost---surrendered is the proper word---America would have a Vichy
government paying tribute both to Germany and Japan. The Jews would be
no more.
But we won
that war. We won it by being more terrifying than the Germans and
Japanese could imagine. Even as we met their soldiers on the battlefield
and annihilated them we firebombed their cities. Hundreds of
thousands of civilians were incinerated. And still we bombed. We became
as death, the destroyer of worlds, to win the war as fast as we could.
The war cost 60,000,000 lives, most of whom were civilians.
It has
been the same in every war since the building of the Sumerian
city-states.
There is
this charming belief that in war only soldiers should slaughter each
other, that non-combatants should be immune. But in which war has this
been the case? Pick up any book on military history and open it to any
page. Or simply begin with ancient warfare. Look up Melos. Carthage.
Corinth. Numantia. Alesia. Persepolis.
In
Medieval Warfare we find: Nika Riots, Viking raids, Mongol empires,
Timur the Lame, Hundred Years War, Crusades, sieges of Constantinople,
civil wars all around.
At the
beginning of our era we find Conquistadors, sacks of Rome, Wars of
Roses, the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars.
And our
own time has been incarnadined: colonial wars, the Boer War, the Rape of Nanking, the World Wars,
the Great Leap Forward, Indo-Pakistani Wars.
In all of
these civilians perished, usually as an act of policy. Such is war. It
is Hell and you cannot change it. To avoid closing with an enemy
out of fear of civilian deaths is to surrender.
It is our enemies who
force us to fight among their women and children and in their mosques,
for there is where they hide.
We are now
engaged in a great conflict, greater than any we have fought. Defeat
would mean
dhimmitude. If you
do not know this word you had best study it well. For much of what we
call the West has already capitulated. Belgium, Holland, Norway, Sweden,
Spain are lost. Within five years France and England will be lost. In
our own nation many movers and shakers---the New York Times, the
Democrat Party, Hollywood---have simply capitulated. They have become
the enemy and perform the proper obeisance to their new masters.
You do not
believe me? I can handle that. For it matters not at all what you
think---or what I think. It matters a great deal what the terror masters
in Iran and Syria think. And right now as I write these words they are
absolutely convinced they can defeat us. Their every word and deed point
to this.
They have
ample reasons for their belief. Recall the day after September 11, 2001.
Bush went to a mosque and proclaimed Islam a religion of peace. Now
think of December 8, 1941. What if FDR had gone to a Sushi bar and
stated how the Japanese were really nice folks?
We would
have lost that war. We are losing this war.
Oh, our
military is invincible. When we meet the enemy we destroy him. But he
will not meet us. He hides among women and children. When we go after
him the media and the Democrats shriek, "We are killing civilians! Stop
this war! Negotiate! Cease fire! Send in the UN!" Think of Baghdad.
Think of Abu Ghraib. Think of Fallujah. Think of Muqtada al-Sadr. Think
of Israel in Lebanon.
How can it
be that our war against Iraq---a cheap, third-rate power whose army
wrote the book on military incompetence---is still going on? It now has
lasted longer than our part in World War II. It should have ended in the
summer of 2003. If we cannot force our will upon the barbarians in Iraq,
how can we possibly do it in Iran, a nation far more powerful and
murderous?
What the
Hell?
It is not
as if Americans have no experience in occupying a defeated nation. That
is exactly what we did to Germany and Japan. That is exactly the model
we should be using now for Iraq. Instead we refuse to declare war
against Iran and Syria. We allow them to re-supply our enemies in Iraq
and Lebanon. We look the other way when they murder our soldiers and
bomb our embassies. We ignore their spittle-flecked Jew hatred. We treat
captured killers with Geneva Convention niceties though these monsters
wear no uniform, salute no flag and terrorize populations. We should
have treated those in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib the way we treated
captured SS---interrogated them and shot them. That should have been
Saddam's fate hours after we captured him.
How is it
that Iranian proxy Hezbollah---a terror group responsible for murdering
hundreds of Americans---can rain fire and death upon Israeli civilians
for years and the world says nothing, yet when Israel responds with a
campaign to minimize civilian deaths the world screams?
How is it
that Islamic nations like Syria and Iran can slaughter Americans---to
say nothing of their own citizens---yet America refuses to declare war
and end these thuggish regimes?
What is
going on here? Some kind of slow-motion
dhimmitude?
If we want
to survive as a civilization we must come to terms with the nature of
the ghoulish barbarians of Islamic fascism. They have been at war with
us since the 1960s. If they win it will be nothing like the era after
the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Then the barbarians desired to
share the bounty of civilization.
Today's
barbarians know nothing of humanity, of civilization. They speak the
language of apocalypse. They treat their Islamic fellows horrifically.
Their specialties are chopping off heads on camera and suicide bombings
of civilians. They praise the honor killing and
sexual
mutilation of their own daughters.
An Islamic
victory would mean the end of our civilization.
There was
no reasoning with the barbarians of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. We
waged total war and forced them to submit to our will. There is no
reasoning with the barbarians of Islamic fascism. They must be hunted
down and killed. For they are most certainly hunting us.
If you
wish to imagine what a world ruled by Islam would look like, read
this. Here is a sample of the types of people killed and types of
things destroyed by Islam just in the last five years:
[Islam] murders Jews and Christians and Hindus and
Buddhists and agnostics and surfers and disco habitués and
businessman and children and guards and pizza lovers and airline
passengers and diplomats and diplomats' wives and diplomats'
children and teachers and writers and missionaries and stewardesses
and professors and journalists and free thinkers. Islam builds
nothing yet blows to smithereens busses and schools and synagogues
and churches and skyscrapers and houses and buildings and embassies
and cemeteries and cars and ships and planes.
Ladies and
gentlemen, these people are coming to kill us. They already have,
thousands of us. And they will continue killing us until the Islamic
flag is placed over Jerusalem and the White House. They have made this
as plain and as clear as words and deeds allow. Why will you not
believe? Would a mushroom cloud over Boston and 200,000 dead Americans
make you believe?
The fact
of the matter is that we as a society and culture must wage total war
against the sponsors of world-wide murder and terror in Syria and Iran.
Iraq is only a beginning. Imagine stopping World War II after Midway or
D-Day. Hitler and Tojo would have been left in power, to wage yet
another ghastly war.
And yes,
civilians will die. Either we kill theirs and end the war or they will
kill ours until we submit. They have left us no other choice.
This war is not about
mercy. No war is. War is about victory. Mercy will come later, after the
US flag is raised over whatever parts of Damascus and Tehran are still
standing.
The killers in Syria and
Iran believe themselves masters at the game of terror. We need to show
them otherwise.
top

July 28, 2006
Wild
Thing Redux
Well I'll
be snookered---and I was. Yesterday's bear tale turned out to be---well,
a story. According to
Snopes
the bear weighed not 1600 pounds but between 1000 and 1200. It stood not
over 12 feet but less than 11. Its killer used not a 7 mm Magnum
semi-automatic but a .338 Winchester Magnum. The shootist was not a
Forest Service employee but an airman stationed at
Eielson Air Force Base near Fairbanks, Alaska. And no human remains were
found in the stomach of the dead ursine. My bad, alas.
Yet none of
this contradicts the moral of the story, which is: When you go into the
wilds, carry a weapon that will bring down any animal you are likely to
encounter. If you choose not to do this, at least have the foresight to
make out a life insurance policy so that your widow and orphan can
sustain themselves
after you disappear in the wilds.
These
photos are accurate, according to Snopes. And check there for the full
story.


And there
is more: Yesterday a friend and I went to a gun shop to look around.
There was enough weaponry in the place to outfit a decent terrorist
cell. The guy behind the counter was named Leroy---remember, this is
Oklahoma. I told him that was interested in a gun that would take out a
Grizzly. And I told Leroy that I was a solo backpacker; thus my possible
gun choices were limited. Any gun must be light yet deadly, and easy to
get to while carrying a heavy backpack. A rifle would probably be out of
the question.
Leroy
understood. In fact he himself had been attacked by a bear in Montana.
Leroy was fishing. He was wearing waders in water up to his hips. A
black bear appeared 50 feet away and charged. Unknown to Leroy the bear
had been guarding her two cubs. As the bear ran into the water Leroy
swung his shotgun off his shoulder and fired two deer slugs into the
beast, killing her.
I asked
him about my choice of pistol, the Smith and Wesson 329PD. He thought it
an excellent choice, but he also showed me a number of other pistols,
all .44 Magnums. Anything smaller would simply not be enough to kill a
Grizzly.
Leroy was
as amused---if that be the right word---as I was about those who go out
into the wilds armed with nothing but the latest gear from REI and
propaganda from animal rights activists. He could not fathom such
attitudes. Of course, few in Oklahoma can.
The gun
will wait until I know about next summer, whether I will head to Peru or
Wyoming. If Peru, then no gun. If Wyoming, then a gun. And lots of ammo.
And of course the latest REI gear too.
top

July 27, 2006
Wild Thing
An acquaintance
of mine heads out today for backpacking in Wyoming. Ok, I am a bit jealous: I
have long wanted to do a walkabout in Wyoming. Time has been a factor why I have
yet to make it out that way---and out Idaho and Montana way as well. And as long
as there are still jungles and Andean peaks that have not felt the tread of my
boots, my thoughts always wander toward Central and South America.
But there is yet another reason why I have not yet
walked out in the American wilds. That reason has four legs and goes by the name
Ursus arctos horribilis. Its common name is Grizzly. I have no intention
of walking about where Grizzlies roam unless I am armed---well-armed.
I was
reminded of this today. Over the internet came
news of the largest Grizzly bear ever recorded. It weighed more than 1600
pounds and stood 14 feet high. To put this in perspective:
If you are an average size man; you would be level with the bear's navel
when he stood upright. The bear would look you in the eye when it walked on
all fours!
To give additional perspective, consider that this particular bear, standing
on its hind legs, could walk up to an average single story house and look
over the roof. It could walk up to a two story house and look in the bedroom
windows.
How we came to know about this monster is itself a
terrifying tale. A US Forest Service worker was out hunting deer in Alaska. A
grizzly charged from 150 feet away. Such an animal can move at more than 30 feet
per second, which gave the guy less than 5 seconds to observe the threat,
consider counter-measures, choose one and implement it. He had a 7 mm magnum
semi-automatic rifle with him---a very good thing. He emptied the rifle into
the bear, and the beast dropped nearly at his feet, though still very much alive.
The man re-loaded and blasted away point blank at the bear's head, which
finished off the creature.
But now comes this horror:
Based on the contents of the bear's stomach, it was established that the
bear had killed at least two humans in the 72 hours before its demise which
included a missing hiker.
The U.S. Forest Service, backtracking from where the bear had originated,
found the hiker's 38 caliber pistol emptied. Not far from the pistol were
the remains of the hiker. The other body has not been found.
Although the hiker fired six shots and managed to hit the bear with four of
those shots (the Service ultimately found four 38 caliber slugs along with
twelve 7mm slugs inside the bear's body), it only wounded the bear and
probably angered it immediately.
The bear was a man-killer. He would have killed
again had not the Forest Service worker shot him---12 times.
And herein lies a lesson. If you go into the wild,
bring along the means to protect yourself against bears. I am not talking about
the usual ridiculous 'advice' given by any number of books on bears---advice
about pepper spray, playing dead, making noise and so on. Such things might
work. If they do not then you will not see home again.
I am talking about carrying a weapon that will kill
anything you might encounter. For Grizzly this means at least a .357 Magnum
pistol, but a .44 Magnum would be better. Here is the real McCoy:

This is a Smith and Wesson
329PD. It will destroy a mountain lion as well as a Grizzly. Had that hiker
had this rather than that absurdly underpowered .38 he would be alive this day.
Some advice from an Alaskan native:
I love bears, and not just to eat. I used to study them. I have friends who
have spent all their professional lives studying them. You can't spend time
around bears and not admire them. But none of us go into bear country
without the means to protect ourselves.
Grizzlies once roamed far a field but now are
concentrated mostly in Alaska and Canada.

A list of fatal bear attacks can be found
here.
But some guys are
lucky.
Here is
one fellow who avoided the fate of that hiker above. A sample:
A man stabbed a black bear to death
with a 15-cm hunting knife, saying he knew he would otherwise become “lunch”
after it attacked him and his dog on a canoeing portage in northern Ontario.
Those who venture into the wilderness must never
forget that
Mother Nature is a bitch with no pity. Her children are 'red in tooth and claw'.
You ignore this at your peril---and that of your children.
top

July 24, 2006
The Return of the Native
Well, I am
not really an Oklahoma native, but I sure feel like one.
Especially after my sojourn in Oregon. I thank God
for my family there, a small island of light, humanity and decency among
the slouching barbarians of Portland.
Yes,
Oregon has trees and flowers and chirping birds and all that---and also
the lowest church attendance in our nation. It shows in the politics and
culture, especially in that Babylon on the Willamette called
Portland. One can observe on its streets the full spectrum of human depravity. I thank God for
Oklahoma---the 'Buckle of the Bible Belt'---and for states like it. They
are part and parcel of God's country.
Plans for
backpacking along the Pacific Crest Trail did not turn out well. North
of Crater Lake experienced the greatest snow pack in 20 years. All sorts
of hikers were stranded because of it. All trails eventually ended in
this:

Here is
snow around Crater Lake:

There was
no going around the snow as it extended for 100 miles northward. And
with the snow came mosquitoes---hordes of them in my eyes, in my food,
in my mouth, in my nose, in my ears, in my toothpaste. These pesky
vampires were in greater number than I had ever witnessed in the jungles
of Central America. Around mid-August they die but I was there in June.
I camped right beneath the snowline and tried to find a way through.
This proved impossible.

The trails
below were pleasant enough:


And so I
did not get quite the 'wild' experience for which I had hoped. But it
was not just because of the snow. There was something missing in all of
this---something missing in all of my backpacking in the US. I cannot as
of yet quite put my finger on it. It might be due to my woeful lack of
experience solo backpacking in God's country. Or---more likely---it
might be that Central and South America reflect more surely than my own
nation exactly what I search for when I head for 'wild, weird climes,
out of space, out of time.' As far as I am concerned there are no such
places in the US. (But there might be such in Wyoming and Montana.)
Yes, I
have not seen much, but I cannot go everywhere and see everything in one
lifetime. I am now 53, and backpacking by myself takes its toll on my
body. Simply stated: I cannot do this forever, perhaps 10-12 years more
before bones and muscles become weary. And there are yet many places in
Latin America where I wish to tread. I am beginning to piece together a
list of them with photos and commentary. A very basic form of it can be
found here. This will
be an on-going project over the next few months.
Which will
keep me busy indeed. And school begins again August 16. And so will
begin another year of my God-given vocation.
And of
course my regular commentary on 'Life, the Universe and Everything' will
commence shortly.
There are
other projects in store as well---but more about these in due course.
Can we say 'Guatemala for Christmas?' Yes, we can.
Be well.
top

|