Joe Lieberman has come out and said what needs to be done—what has needed to be done since 1981.
I think we’ve got to be prepared to take aggressive military action against the Iranians to stop them from killing Americans in Iraq…And to me, that would include a strike over the border into Iran, where we have good evidence that they have a base at which they are training these people coming back into Iraq to kill our soldiers.
Of course Harry Reid immediately took the Democrat standard position on America’s enemies and issued a pre-emptive surrender before war has even been declared.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid rejected on Monday another prominent senator’s call for a military strike against Iran, saying a U.S. attack would destabilize the Middle East.
Could someone tell that fool of a man from Nevada that destabilization of Iran is exactly what is needed? That a stable regime of the mullahs means more dead Americans? That the mullahs have financed the murder of Reid’s fellows for a generation?
Or better yet: Just ignore such weaklings and get on with the business of war.
The math is simple: Iran has been dedicated to terror since the fall of the shah and creation of the regime of the mullahs. We need not repeat the numerous outrages this regime has inflicted upon five continents and hundreds of thousands of human beings since its wretched birth. Simply type into yahoo search ‘Iran terror’ and you will have at your fingertips 27,000,000 references.
Take your pick.
Iran is Islam writ large. If you ever wondered what the world would look like if Islam actually dominated the world, take a look at how the mullahs treat all of their enemies real and imagined. They stone teenage girls to death. They silence with prison, torture or death all critics within their grasp. They finance killing, kidnapping and terror around the globe.
Iran is Islam purified and concentrated—and in your face.
The mullahs in Iran are hate-addled fanatics but they are not stupid. They believe that they can defeat the US given the right circumstances. What might these circumstances—what political scientists call “the correlation of forces”—be?
Iran desires that the killing in Iraq and Afghanistan of American servicemen continue or even increase. She knows that the American media will revel in every death. Iran thinks that keeping the US busy and distracted in both places will eventually cause the American people to tire of both wars.
This is the center of Iranian strategy. She might be right. After all, the mullahs already have Harry Reid’s support.
We now see the meaning behind this:
A senior U.S. diplomat accused Iran on Tuesday of transferring weapons to Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan—the most direct comments yet on the issue by a ranking American official.
The Brits know this as well.
In Afghanistan it is clear that the Taliban is receiving support, including arms from … elements of the Iranian regime,” British Prime Minister Tony Blair wrote in the May 31 edition of the Economist.
We should not be surprised at this. Killing American servicemen is their policy. In other words, they are at war with us—and we have done scant little about it outside of Munich levels of appeasement.
As usual Iran threatens global retaliation if attacked—she has threatened this for 20 years. But if her words alone can cripple our foreign policy and cause the US to become a nation of dhimmis then we should just close up shop and go home. America will have ceased being a nation of any consequence.
Iran’s words are empty threats. If she had such power it would have long ago either been used or come into the light. In the real world her reach is seen as ‘global’ only because she can finance murder and mayhem around the world. But this is penny ante mischief, and such a ‘global reach’ is available even to Swaziland.
Iran exerts true strategic influence only in Lebanon, Iraq and parts of Afghanistan.
The rulers of Iran are in reality a criminal gang that survives through extortion, assassination and threats of violence. It functions in the Middle East as Al Capone functioned in Chicago—and likewise is involved with prostitution, the international drug trade and murder for hire.
The real issue here—the only issue here—is why a nation such as ours with pretensions of global responsibilities would allow such a pest as the regime of the mullahs to have survived more than a fortnight after 1981. Every single US president from the sainted Ronald Reagan to George Bush has allowed the Iranian infection to fester. Sanctions, diplomacy, patience—all have failed. War with the mullahs will not.
Let us not be beguiled by the Harry Reid types who wring their soft hands like schoolgirls and bemoan what they see as invincible Iranian power. The power of the mullahs cannot even effectively control parts of her own nation, especially where Kurds and Azeris dominate. The Iranian navy is almost equal to the Peruvian fishing fleet. The Iranian Air Force is nonexistent. The Iranian army is more suited to terrorizing women than engaging in combat.
What the Hell are we waiting for?
Every day that delays the destruction of that hostile and cancerous regime is another day that sees more dead US servicemen and more wailing of American widows and orphans. If Bush really wants to support the troops he can send them off to kill those who would kill their brothers in arms. That is their job. They are good at it. Damn good, in fact.
What the Hell are we waiting for?
The problem in the Middle East has always been Iran. Once we decide to end that regime we will see all sorts of other annoyances end as well, including the problems of Iraqi anarchy and Hezbollah terror.
What the Hell are we waiting for?
The regime must be extinguished as completely as was Carthage.