Something that has always amused me is the number of males who support Hillary. I used ‘males’ rather than ‘men,’ the simple reason being for this literary sleight of hand is that while all men are males the reverse is manifestly not true. One could as easily write that while Hillary is a female—most of my sources agree on this—she is no woman, and certainly no lady.
The chronicles of Hillary are so well documented that there is no real debate over her character. All is known that need be known. I need not even list them here. It is enough to ask a simple but entirely sensible question: What sort of man would enjoy waking up to Hillary Clinton every morning for the rest of his life? To have the first thing he sees every day be her charming face? To know that forever and a day she would always be at his side?
A man considers this and can thus feel some pity for Bill Clinton.
It is not at all about Hillary’s looks—not totally anyway. It is all about what she is. In no particular order of importance, here is what she is: Filthy mouthed, arrogant, mendacious, condescending, corrupt, domineering, nagging—and without a doubt a hater of real men. How she became such a creature is a question for a psychologist—or perhaps a theologian—and her condition predates her association with Bill.
Hillary’s willingness to tolerate Bill’s compulsive philandering is a function of her general contempt for men. She distrusts them and feels morally superior to them…It’s no coincidence that Hillary’s staff has always consisted mostly of adoring women, with nerdy or geeky guys forming an adjunct brain trust.
Want more? Paglia provides it.
I agree that the male staff who Hillary attracts are slick, geeky weasels or rancid, asexual cream puffs…If I were to hazard a guess, I’d say Hillary is reconstituting the toxic hierarchy of her childhood household, with her on top instead of her drill-sergeant father…How anyone could confuse Hillary’s sourly cynical, male-bashing megalomania with authentic feminism is beyond me.
Now we know why Hillary has nothing but contempt for the military. It is not at all about this policy or that policy, or about Iraq. It is because the military is made up of real men. This also the reason she despises George Bush and Dick Cheney. This is also the reason she is in favor of gun control. Real men are comfortable around guns.
And—no surprise here—this is why homosexuals simply adore Hillary. These questionable males, so perverse in their behavior, so confused about the purpose of the lower male bowel, so wretched in their lives, see in Hillary the strong domineering figure so missing from their own existence. It is similar with the legions of poorly educated single moms. They see in Hillary someone who will get revenge upon those males in their own lives who ‘did them wrong.’
It is not only that real men would never support Hillary. Real women would never support her either. Real women hold a secret disdain for females who dominate males. To them such a condition is wholly unnatural. If you do not know this then you do not know women. And it must be said that wimpish males—‘asexual cream puffs’— who are married to shrewish, Hillary-type females, who are so nagged and dominated in their homes, will exact revenge in the secrecy and anonymity of the voting booth.
It is no secret that poor old Bill long ago fled Hillary’s bed for more pleasant climes. Can any of us really blame the guy?