Some questions that vex me:
Why did Obama cede control of his convention to the Clintons?
All the explanations given by the Clinton camp and the Obama camp are absurd. Simply stated, Obama was strong-armed by the Clintons. They rolled him over with the greatest of ease. Which leads to:
What do the Clintons have on Obama?
Has it something to do with Obama’s claims of birthplace and citizenship? Which leads to:
Why did Obama spend ‘vacation’ time in Hawaii?
One might think that with his convention mere weeks away, Obama would be preparing himself, shoring up and reaching beyond his base and doing all those political things that political creatures do. But no, he takes off for the tropics. Odd, yes?
Did not suitable ‘vacation’ spots exist here in the continental US? Was there something in Hawaii that demanded his immediate and personal attention? Or was he simply told to ‘get out of Dodge’ for a while to allow the Clintons free reign?
As is the norm when the Clintons are involved, there are lies within lies within lies, all of them twisted and shadowy, as convoluted as the knot of Gordius.
Only the willfully blind do not know that Bill Clinton and his moll are superbly competent gangsters, with domestic connections reaching into the media, the Democrat Party and academia, and international connections reaching to China, Indonesia—where Obama went to school, please recall—and the Saudi Arabian Peninsula.
And no, I have no conclusions. But it does seem strange that Clinton has yet again forced another political opponent into the Lewinsky position.
And a bit off the topic—but perhaps not:
Why do so many here and abroad who hate the United States and Israel support Obama?
Something is happening off-stage, behind the scenes. As yet we can see little more than Maya’s Dance.
Update: Is it possible for a man to be more shallow, more gaseous, more foam-filled, than this?
Update: Yes, it seems that it is. It appears that the Obama is dyeing his hair gray to “look more distinguished.” Is there nothing at all substantial about this creature? Angelina Jolie would be a better candidate than this fop. At least she likes guns and babies. The Obama would ban the first and stick scissors into the second.
Update: I wonder where Obama can find those who are as empty as he and who would give him their support—and loads of dough? Oh…I found them!
14 Comments;
Surely you are not suggesting that “The One” is not all that the left has painted him to be and that the spurned woman would take his place?How would a certain segment of the US take this pill?They would wretch,convulse and throw a tantrum of fire and blood shed.What will happen is the DNC will give the Clintons the stage and then pull it out from under them.There are many who hate the Clintons because the Clintons were mean to “The One”.Scorned liberal women will not riot.They will not burn and loot the businesses that support their communities.What they will do is split the democrat party.We will get a 3 party system.Communists,Democrats and Republicans.Point of fact is Obama has been on vacation since he was born. He has never worked a day in his life.
Dear Mike:
Obama reminds me of a sock puppet. Somebody is behind the fellow, and not just George Soros, that creepy money man of the grimy Left. No, much more is going on. I cannot yet make out more than the bare outlines of this Obama thing, but we include the media and academia in this Royal Scam.
Once this house of foam dissolves there will be recriminations all around. Remember all those pundits of both Right and Left who saw Obama as worthy to sit in the White House? All their platitudes for and praise of Obama? Remember Obama being seen as some sort of a miracle worker, a ‘Light Worker’, a brilliant man and orator? What utter fools they were and are and always shall be.
I do not think that the DNC will pull the plug on the Clintons or do anything to embarrass them. Those gangsters Bill and Hillary had access to all sorts of files during their 8 years of soiling this nation. They have ‘stuff’ on everybody they need to have ‘stuff’ on—Dean and Kennedy and Obama included. The Clintons will continue to treat this Republic as their personal stained dress until they leave this world, naturally or otherwise.
Of course Obama never worked a day in his life. This condition is a resume enhancement for Democrats. All the movers and shakers of that party are parasites, never working yet living off the sweat of others.
The Democrats might indeed split. It will make for great entertainment.
Allow me to suggest a theme to Bill’s speech at the convention: “But Obama is an honorable man!”
A little Shakespeare for you on a Saturday.
Dear KT Cat:
Thank you for the Shakespeare! And we must remember that Hillary will be in Denver not to praise Obama but to bury him.
Scipio:
Why do so many of America’s critics support Obama? Here’s a few reasons why Obama is the ideal identi-kit politicians that Europeans adore:
He’s liberal; he’s black; he has a “cosmopolitan” identity; he’s never had a proper job; he’s fairly young and inexperienced; he projects an androgynous personality; he’s married to a militant wife; he’s admitted to youthful drug taking; he’s never been in the military; he isn’t bald.
If asked to manufacture an all-purpose politician with his finger on the pulse of the Zeitgeist, a committee of public relations experts would surely come up with an Obama clone.
Dear Alex:
You have knocked it out of the park. Obama hits every transnational button, every PC button, every multicultural button, every metrosexual button.
I have two things in common with that simpering little fop. I am not bald, and I used drugs as a callow college lad—and still graduated at the top of my class.
Imagine this nation as composed of nothing but males—I cannot use the word ‘men’—like Obama. We would not survive half a generation.
Scipio, The Obambi is today’s “Manchurian Candidate”. He has been manufactured, manicured, teleprompted, trained to be only one thing. The President. (And not necessarily the President of the USA. He’s being portrayed as President of the World.) You are correct in your analogy that Obambi is like a sock puppet. His strings are pulled by George Soros, but I agree that there are others in the wings who pull those strings as well. The Chinese maybe? Obambi sure collected quite a bit of money from the Chinese and a number of other unscrupulous people. It bothers me that whenever you see Obambi, he’s portrayed as some “Messiah”. Or the use of old Soviet propaganda posters/Mao posters makes me wonder if we aren’t seeing something more sinister in the works. Obambi is an empty suit and there are people behind the scenes who will truly be in power once this fop is “crowned” “Messiah of America”.
Dear Pothus:
What is more disturbing than Obama advertising himself as a messiah is the number of Americans who have bought into the claptrap. The reality of this Obama fellow has been evident from the start—his emptiness, his vapidity, his socialism, his hatred of this nation. But millions simply cannot wait to vote for this sham of a man. What the Hell has happened to this Republic that a creature like Obama can be considered fit to occupy the White House?
It is not the case that these millions were somehow fooled. No, they went for Obama with their eyes open and their checkbooks out. It is as you implied, that there is more here than meets the eye.
It is not Obama who is a danger to a free nation, it is the people in that nation who support him. They are as spiritually empty as their savior.
Scipio: You are correct that there are many Americans who have fallen head over hells for this empty suit. I have no answer as to why, but it did get me thinking. I could be wrong and I am not trying to paint the man in a bad light, but I don’t think he will be good for this country. History repeats itself and still we don’t learn. For example: Notice his use of symbols? The big “O”, and the many photos of him appearing to have a halo around his head. I am reminded of another man who was surrounded by substance and symbols, Adolf Hitler. Now I am not saying that Obama is like Hitler, heaven forbid the world has to live with another man like that, but Obama’s use of symbols and iconic images is too similar. Now I understand the Obamanites (or whatever they call themselves), also have a salute that they will use during the DNC convention. Hands raised above the head to form a circle. This is all too eerily similar. Also, his wanting to have the convention at a larger venue so as to have as many people bask in his glow, reminds me of those films at Nuremberg with all of Adolf’s adoring fans, screaming his name and saluting their Führer with right arm extended. The man has offered nothing but empty promises and still many American’s fawn all over him.
This is too weird to believe but there are too many similar things happening today that seems to have already happened back in the late 30’s and early 40’s.
Why have so many Americans fallen for this man and what has happened to our great country? I’m sure my comparison to Obama and Adolf will anger some, but I only see the similarities of their use of symbols and icons and have to wonder and start to think.
Dear Pothus:
It is not that any connection between Obama-mania and that Austrian fellow would be out of place, but it is obvious that both men used a certain type of iconography to present themselves to the public. Nothing new here. Such things have been used before but only by those whose programs demanded obeisance to the state. Stalin, Lenin, Mussolini and an entire host of Latin American and African politicians come to mind.
In fact our first examples of such come from Mesopotamia, Sumer to be precise—and around 3600 BC, proving that fantasmas such as Obama are not new in the world. See the representations of Sargon, of Hammurabi, of Nebuchadnezzar, of Ashurbanipal, of Ramses II. Even the Caesars got into the act. Julius Caesar himself was the first leader who practiced what we call today mass party politics of the type that are common in Chicago. The Caesars after him used iconic statuary to make their case to the people. See the head of Constantine for a fine example, but about any Roman emperor will do.
Such crude iconic propaganda is new in US history, but its appearance fulfills a need. As the ideological and Christian foundations of our Republic melt away, something is required to replace them. That something is simply state worship—bluntly, fascism. State worship needs to emulate certain traits and rituals of religion and ape its modes of behavior. Thus the Obama craze—the halos, the saintly photos, the chanting, the rituals, the cravenness.
One more point and I am done for now. We bemoan the fact of media manipulation and sycophancy in favor of the Obama, but such things have always been common in every form of state worship. As much as possible the political co-opts the levers of every possible competitor—all media, academia, entertainment. This happened long ago with Obama as it has with every Democrat politician since the late 50s. One competitor outside of his control right now is the military. Every demagogue in history has had to contend with the military. Some buy it off; some create another military as an armed force to use against the state military; some arise from the military itself.
Obama has made his plans for the US military plain. He will underfund it, pollute it with sodomy and waste it away with ‘nation building’ stupidity until no good men will join. That is his plan anyway. That is always the Democrats’ plan. Recall that Clinton cut the size of our military by almost half. Could we use those men now?
I will use this essay to seize the opportunity to point out the most amazing hole that Mr Obama has dug for himself. His reply to the question of the point a fetus becomes a human being has just perplexed me beyond anything else I have ever heard a politician say in public. To begin with, his answer to such a profound issue was so abstract, so professorial, so dry and unemotional, and so condescending to caring people that I was left speechless. This was no accident, as I am sure he has mulled this subject over for weeks, months, maybe years. This was a glimpse at the real mind of Obama. His reference only to the “theological perspective”, or the “scientific perspective”, left the gaping hole for me. He completely ignored the “MORAL PERSPECTIVE”. This man is evil, a devil, and in my opinion destined to go down in flames. The DNC damage control specialists kill me with their spin on the wellness of the Obama campaign. His campaign is in major trouble and everyone knows it. The Hillary issue is laughable, she got “dissed”, and the DNC is trying to dismiss that as no big deal. In my country opinion it is one of several major symptoms of a run at the presidency that is out of control. In aviation terms it would be called a death spiral. They deserve every bit of it!
Please forgive my rant.
Donny
Dear Starlifter:
Rant on. I do it as well.
You write with crystal clarity of the evil that resides in Obama. The monster will indeed ‘go down in flames,’ either here or in Eternity.
I can think of few men who have been as despicable as that creature. Not even other evil men such as Carter and Gore and Clinton are Obama’s equal.
When thinking of such men—and of the people who support them—the only word that makes any sense is ‘depravity.’
The media has proclaimed the winner, the media has set the stage, the media has foreordained the next president, but we still have an election, unless of course the media is connected to all the polling places. No need to make any more comments ya’ll have done a great job thus far. This East Texan is darn sure happy about your discussions. There really is a God and He is aware of our situation.
Dear Rockingg:
You are right about our lovely media. They have made clear their hopes and dreams for this nation. Allow me to say that theirs in no way corresponds to mine.
God is indeed in charge. But that does not mean that we can avoid a great chastisement. On the contrary.